Netx360

June-2nd-2020, 01:15 PM

NetX360 will show any warnings related to these orders after you click Submit. You can either ignore these warnings and choose to process your trades, or contact Pershing for further clarity on any impacts these warnings may have on your client accounts. Settlement & Sync with Riskalyze.

Hello,
  • NetX Information Systems is committed to helping clients reduce cost and improve efficiency. Protect information with computer security systems and training programs.
  • Netx360 download Is a graphical popup asking that displays a strategy of toner supply trucks, links for reordering consumables, and an external platform landing page for that problem HP device model. With this netx360, after you press Enteryou can ask Google Cadet questions directly.
I've started experimenting with EtherCAT and NetHAT over STM32MP157C-DK2 board. I measured the xChannelIORead and xChannelIOWrite performances and I'm obtaining results more than 2ms for each, between 4-5ms for both with a large amount of jitter. My embedded Linux is patched with PREEMPT_RT and the measurements were done inside a high priority RT thread.
I was expecting to get latencies < 1 ms for real time with EtherCAT and I was wondering if these measurements are expected on the NetHAT.
This is the function I used for measuring time:

Netx360 Downloader

uint64_t getTimeNanoseconds() {
struct timespec ts;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
return (uint64_t)(ts.tv_sec) * 1000000000 + (uint64_t)(ts.tv_nsec);
}

How the measurement is done:
while(counter < 10000)
{
while( CIFX_DEV_NO_COM_FLAG (lRet = xChannelBusState( hChannel, CIFX_BUS_STATE_ON, &ulState, 10))){
printf('Waiting for Bus communication!rn');
}
abSendData[1] = !abSendData[1];
startTime = getTimeNanoseconds();
if(CIFX_NO_ERROR (lRet = xChannelIORead(hChannel, 0, 0, sizeof(abRecvData), abRecvData, 10))){
tr_r = getTimeNanoseconds() - startTime;
sum_r += tr_r;
rTimes[counter] = tr_r;
}
else {
printf('Error reading n');
return NULL;
}
startTime = getTimeNanoseconds();
if(CIFX_NO_ERROR (lRet = xChannelIOWrite(hChannel, 0, 0, sizeof(abSendData), abSendData, 10))){
tr_wr = getTimeNanoseconds() - startTime;
sum_wr += tr_wr;
wTimes[counter] = tr_wr;
}
else {
printf('Error writing n');
return NULL;
}
counter++;
printf('R | Time : %llu Average : %llu | W | Time : %llu Average : %llu |n', tr_r, sum_r / counter, tr_wr, sum_wr / counter);
usleep(cycleTime);
}

I obtain different performances depending on 'cycleTime' - time between each read/write call - I have much more jitter with cycle time < 1ms than for example 10ms. I also have different performances depending on when I execute, I can execute same code twice and get different average latencies.
The cycle time of the master is 200us for sending/receiving process data.
I'm not quite familiar with real time protocol programming and I would like to know if these measurements are expected if not I'm curious to know the cause of these latencies.Netx360

Netx360 Logo


Netx360 Logo

Thank you,